Difference between electrophoretic paint and regular paint of brand tag-B
Fourth. application scenarios and cost effectivenessElectrophoretic paintApplication Scene: Automobile, home appliance, hardware and other industries with high requirements on coating performance.Cost-effectiveness: initial equipment investment is high, but the comprehensive cost (paint utilization, labor, maintenance) is lower than ordinary paint.Ordinary PaintApplicable fields: construction, furniture, general industrial products and other scenes that do not require high coating performance.Cost-effectiveness: low initial investment, but higher long-term running costs (paint waste, rework, environmental protection input). Fifth. comprehensive comparison summaryIndicator Electrophoretic paint Ordinary paintProcess complexity High (requires electrophoresis equipment, automated control) Low (manual or simple equipment operation)Coating uniformity Excellent (uniform thickness, good edge coverage) Fair (greatly influenced by operation methods)Corrosion resistance Strong (dense coating, excellent protection) Weak (need primer or increased thickness)Environmentally friendly Excellent (waterborne coatings, low VOCs emissions) Poor (solventborne coatings, high VOCs emissions)Safety High (no risk of flammability or explosion) Low (requires strict management of storage and use environment)Applicable fields High-end manufacturing such as automobiles, home appliances, hardware, etc. Construction, furniture, general industrial productsCost-effectiveness Low long-term comprehensive cost Low initial investment, but high long-term operating cost
